Thursday, June 3, 2010
Normally, I find criticism of Presidents for taking a vacation or playing a round of golf to be pretty lame (Note: Obama has played a LOT more golf than Bush did).
But I saw ANOTHER headline on ESPN today about Obama, and his opinion on whether LeBron James should stay in Cleveland. This is getting old.
Seriously, Mr. President - could you please just get back to work? We don't care to hear your opinion on matters that don't have anything to do with your job.
This week, Paul McCartney was honored by the Library of Congress for some award for popular song. Super.
Apparently, the event took place at the White House, so I guess Sir Paul felt it was therefore appropriate to bash on President Bush:
After the last eight years, it's great to have a president who knows what a library is.
Seriously, - why was that necessary? What in the hell did it have to do with the award?
If you want to talk about incompetence and stupidity, you idiot, take a look at Obama's job performance to date.
Paul McCartney - a true ass.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
I read something interesting today:
They say the Constitution is not a suicide pact. Neither is consistency a suicide pact. If Bush and Obama were competing in the Olympics in the high jump, and the liberals set the bar at 9 feet for Bush, we cannot permit them to set the bar at three feet for Obama.
Nine feet is the mark. I didn't argue for that high bar for success under Bush, but, the mark having been established, I'll be damned if I'm going to let it be lowered for King Obama.
Does anyone doubt the fact that the left, be it media, academia, or politicians, hold Obama to a different standard? Is it at all surprising that they cry racism when one dares to criticize the President? They are so preoccupied with the color of this man's skin, that they cannot see him as an equal to white men.
It really is that simple. Today's left refuses to equate Barack Obama with his predecessors (all white men). It believes he should not be judged in the same manner as a normal (see: WHITE MALE) politician. They are judging him on the basis of his skin color.
Is this not racism?
Thursday, May 27, 2010
One of the big stories in Washington DC these days is whether, back in February, the White House offered a federal job (widely believed to be the Sec. of Navy gig) to Democratic Representative Joe Sestak, who was running against White House favorite Democratic Senator Arlen Specter in the US Senate Democratic Primary for Pennsylvania.
As the story goes, because it was afraid that Specter would lose in the primary election to Sestak (which is exactly what happened), the White House offered Sestak a job to drop out. Here's the problem: such an offer would have been a federal crime.
One congressman (a Republican, to be sure) has come out and said this could be an impeachable offense.
Today, after several weeks of this being in the news, President Obama addressed the situation for the first time, saying that nothing improper was done, and that an official explanation was coming.
Why has it taken so long to formulate an official explanation if nothing was done improperly? Why has the White House been so mum on this issue for so long?
We do not know all the facts, but either the Democratic candidate for the US Senate in Pennsylvania is lying, or the White House has committed a crime in an effort to secure its political agenda. This could be a clear example of how this administration endangers our liberty and freedom. We have a ruling regime willing to break laws in order to capture power.
Monday, May 24, 2010
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Remember how the media loved to point out how, in the 2006 and 2008 elections, Republicans were distancing themselves from George W. Bush?
It only took Barack Obama a year or so to have the same effect on Democrats running for office.
Kudos to the Washington Times for actually running this piece. We'll see if anyone else picks up on it.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
I follow baseball, and the editor of a blog I regularly visit took the time to comment briefly on Arizona's immigration law. Of course, his comments were derogatory, calling the law "preposterous" and its authors "ignorant." Reading his obviously uninformed comments really raised my ire. Now, it was one thing to read one layperson's comments on the law. Most people know far less than they think (myself included).
However, while I can excuse this person's comments, I cannot excuse those of Attorney General Eric Holder, Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano, or President Obama. All three of these "leaders," whose opinions on this subject do matter, have made statements that make clear they have not read the law.
President Obama promised competency and hope and change and all that garbage. What we have received instead an arrogant, deceitful, incompetent administration which believes it can say or do whatever it wants, with no consequences. US officials this week brought up the Arizona law in its human rights talks with China. It had the gall to compare the efforts of an American state to enforce laws meant to protect this country (has anyone argued US immigration laws are illegal or unconstitutional?) with the very real human rights violations that are committed in China.
Disgusting. There is no need to read the law. No need to consider the plight of Arizonans whose daily lives are affected by illegal immigration. Obama the activist speaks now, and refuses to think, period. He is driven by a mindset so foreign and hostile to American ideals, that his power becomes a real danger to the future of this country.
The election of 2008 may turn out to be the greatest swindle in US history. Let's hope it isn't too late to stop that from happening.